🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to reinitiate nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi said exclusively dialogue worked, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by intermediaries to restart negotiations with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no secret atomic facilities, and Tehran could not yet allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.

Walking a Complex Course

The foreign minister is treading a difficult path since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be proceeding from a stance of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen more resilient in military terms and mentally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the primary cause of the stalemate in the previous talks.

Prior Negotiations Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump asserting the sites had been obliterated. Following this, EU nations employed their privilege to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "perfect agreement" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the talks that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the partnership suggestion. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the American negotiator only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Status

Tehran representatives stated the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in some form if discussions restart.

The US president recently claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran wanted to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from key regional mediators, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to depict the US as a controlling nation that exploits the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war revealed the conflict could not be resolved by combat operations. He asserted the attacks started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were carried out with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence hard to reestablish.

Dialogue Continues the Final Solution

The foreign minister declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently sought to dictate their will during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the primary solution to settle disputes, but its requirements, rules and fundamentals must be followed."

"If they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and respect, they will obtain a answer in the identical language."

Repair and Rebuilding

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the battle of repair and reconstruction, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained numerous insights from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the vulnerabilities of the adversary."

He added: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, remains in place. The facilities and equipment, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to break. The citizens of Tehran have become stronger, more united, and more supportive of the government and the nation in the face of this invasion."